Limited coverage: 3 publication ratings across 2 provisional families. The score summarizes overall service opinions; it is not a rating of this exact plan or a StealthVPN security test.
Tax may apply at checkout. Introductory promotions and availability may vary. A successful build does not refresh prices.
MATCH THE TIER AND THE DEVICE
What can you use with this plan?
Provider documentation describes these setup paths and conditions. We have not installed or tested them. An available app does not establish feature parity, streaming access or identical support on every operating-system version.
VPN-session claims differ from optional Proton Account login-IP logging and anti-abuse checks.
Provider policy statements · Free and paid VPN; the Proton Account policy also applies. These are attributed claims, not StealthVPN observations of the service.
A no-storage claim applies to the category described. It does not rule out account records, website tracking, payment-processor data or an optional feature. “Not established” means the reviewed source did not settle this field. Read the separate assessments and event record
Not in the listed Five / Nine / Fourteen country sets
Ownership / group
Proton Foundation (primary shareholder)
Parent / owner country
Switzerland
Evidence basis
Provider documents + published country-set research
What the location tells you
Switzerland is not listed in the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes country sets. This does not rule out Swiss legal requests or other international cooperation.
Country grouping is our classification of the declared service jurisdiction. It is not evidence that a VPN shares customer data, or a finding that an unlisted jurisdiction is safe. Provider policy statements are not independently verified here. Read the practical implications
An on-site evidence view, not a privacy score. Policy claims, commissioned assessments and historical events answer different questions. Event dates below retain their documented precision; a year or month is not an exact day.
Period: Report: 18 August–19 September 2025; on-site work: 18–20 August 2025
Commissioned by / engagement: Proton AG
Scope: Production VPN-server no-logs controls, using a representative sample and guided live-system review.
Reported result: Securitum reports that the examined production environment adhered to the assessed no-logs policy.
Limits: Excludes CI/CD, formal source review, account/accounting systems and binary analysis. Not an unsupervised forensic investigation or inspection of every server.
Report pp. 2–4: engagement scope, exclusions and limitations.
Newest event first. Responses are attributed; an announced remediation is not independently verified by StealthVPN. A related product or former owner is identified in the event scope.
Proton VPN’s report lists 59 orders and 59 denied orders for 2025. It says the requests sought to identify users connected to particular VPN servers at particular times.
Data outcome and relevance
Provider statement
Proton says it could not provide the requested identifying information because the necessary VPN logs were not kept.
Response / reported subsequent action
Provider statement
The report distinguishes Swiss-approved legal process from foreign requests. That legal description is Proton’s position.
Unresolved / not established
These are self-reported totals for a defined period, not independently inspected court files. They concern VPN connection identification and do not establish that no account or billing data exists.
Scope: Proton Mail; related company, different product
Record or attributed account
Provider statement
Proton’s September 2021 response says Swiss authorities issued a binding order in the case of a French activist, and explains targeted IP logging obligations for Mail accounts.
Data outcome and relevance
Provider statement
The episode concerns targeted account/IP information in Proton Mail. It is not a documented Proton VPN traffic-log handover.
Response / reported subsequent action
Provider statement
Proton said it could not appeal that request and distinguished the legal treatment of Mail and VPN. The page includes a subsequent court-ruling update.
Unresolved / not established
The underlying order and resulting disclosed dataset were not reviewed. The response does not support treating every Proton product as having identical obligations, or treating its 2021 legal explanation as a permanent statement of law.
These reviews belong to their publishers. Their methods, commercial relationships and testing dates differ. Our provisional editorial metascore groups eligible overall ratings by publisher family; all original summaries and source caveats remain below.
4 review publications represent 3 source families for this service. The editorial metascore shows eligible opinions and family weighting; it does not rate this exact subscription or certify security. Inspect this provider’s speed evidence
Proton VPN review – Swiss privacy pedigree and undeniable security
Overall editorial rating: 4.2 / 5
REVIEW IN BRIEF
TechRadar recommends Proton VPN’s privacy-focused design, clean apps, torrenting support and WireGuard performance.
Main caveat: It reports weaker OpenVPN speeds, streaming trouble with NetShield and some kill-switch compatibility issues. Protocol and settings matter to these results.
Our paraphrase · source checked 2026-11-06
Coverage: Not captured.
Article updated: 2026-10-23; originally published 2022-10-24
Test period: not captured. Article updates may cover only part of a review.
Metadata collected 2026-11-06. External publisher; may earn affiliate commissions.
Tom’s Guide · Future family
Proton VPN review – Powerful, private, and increasingly accessible
Overall editorial rating: 4.35 / 5
REVIEW IN BRIEF
Tom’s Guide highlights open-source apps, expanded server coverage and strong streaming results, alongside the separate free tier.
Main caveat: It finds standard pricing less competitive and the apps and help material potentially daunting for beginners. Free-tier praise does not describe paid-plan features.
Our paraphrase · source checked 2026-11-06
Coverage: Not captured.
Article updated: 2026-10-28; originally published 2022-11-02
Test period: not captured. Article updates may cover only part of a review.
Metadata collected 2026-11-06. External publisher; may earn affiliate commissions.
Top10VPN · Top10VPN family
Proton VPN review (paid service)
Overall editorial rating · paid service: 9.1 / 10
REVIEW IN BRIEF
For the paid plan, Top10VPN highlights privacy protections, Secure Core, port forwarding and improved streaming access.
Main caveat: It reports variable download performance and some playback frame-rate drops. The article also reviews the free tier, whose streaming and torrenting restrictions are different.
Our paraphrase · source checked 2026-11-07
Coverage: Paid service; exact subscription not captured.
Article updated: 2026-10-14
Test period: not captured. Article updates may cover only part of a review.
Manually checked 2026-11-06. Affiliate-supported. The publisher’s methods describe self-funding/no paid reviews; its terms also allow commercial influence on ordering and scores. This verdict is not treated as an independent extra vote or a StealthVPN test.
RTINGS · RTINGS family
Proton VPN lab review (paid service)
Private Browsing: 7.5 / 10
Category ratings only; no overall score imported.
REVIEW IN BRIEF
RTINGS praises Proton VPN’s leak protection, functioning kill switch, privacy-preserving registration options and port forwarding.
Main caveat: It is less positive about policy readability and subscription-retention practices. Its Private Browsing score combines policy judgments with technical findings; it is not an overall rating.
Our paraphrase · source checked 2026-11-07
Coverage: Paid service; see source for tested tier.
Retest: 2026-10-14; originally published 2025-03-31
Test period: not captured. Article updates may cover only part of a review.
Manually checked 2026-11-06. Membership and affiliate-supported publisher. Category score manually checked. A retest or writing update does not date all measurements.